Why this is hard to keep track of

  • A meal that didn't happen isn't an event, so nothing anywhere records it
  • The cost lands hours later, which is far too long a gap for memory to bridge
  • Every tracker records what you ate, and none record what you didn't
  • "I'll eat properly tomorrow" is unfalsifiable without a record

Worth recording

  • Whether each meal happened. A tick is a complete entry
  • Roughly when, since timing matters more than content here
  • What got in the way — meetings, travel, no appetite, no time
  • What the evening looked like afterwards

Cadence

Three ticks a day at most. The lowest-effort log on the site

What progress looks like

A visible record of which meals happen and which vanish, and a clear view of what a day with all of them does to the evening that follows.

In practice

Say it once, or photograph it

The entries most worth having are the ones made at the exact moment nobody wants to fill in a form. A sentence — typed, dictated, or replaced entirely by a photo of the plate — is a much lower bar, and it carries the context a calorie field would have thrown away.

Eating Regular Meals Chat

No breakfast, no lunch, back-to-back meetings until four. Ate properly at seven and then kept going all evening.

Called 4 tools

  • log_meal(meal: "breakfast", happened: false)
  • log_meal(meal: "lunch", happened: false, reason: "meetings")
  • log_meal(items: ["dinner"], at: "19:00")
  • compare_periods(metric: "evening_eating", group_by: "meals_missed")

Logged. Days with two or more missed meals: unplanned evening eating on 11 of 13. Days with all three: three of 22. That's the clearest split in your log, and it's held for two months.

Every figure here was counted from entries you made. The model chose which tools to call — it doesn't score the meal, estimate calories from a photo, or decide what any of it says about you.

And then ask

The question the log can answer

Months of entries hold real answers to the things you've been guessing at, and reading them properly has always meant a spreadsheet and a free evening — which is exactly what nobody has.

Ask in plain language. The answers come back with the counts behind them, including when those counts are too thin to mean anything yet — which is the more useful answer far more often than people expect.

Asking about the pattern Chat

What actually gets in the way? It feels like it's just busy days.

Called 3 tools

  • get_history(topic: "regular-meals", window: "6m")
  • find_pattern(group_by: "context")
  • compare_periods(metric: "entries")

Busy is part of it and not the main part. Of 24 missed lunches, 16 fall on days with a meeting between twelve and two — but you have 31 days with a meeting in that window, so it's not deterministic. The stronger split is whether lunch was brought with you: on the 19 days you'd noted bringing food, lunch happened 17 times.

Counts and averages over your own entries, nothing more. Where the data is confounded or too thin, the answer says so instead of rounding it into a conclusion.

What it does

Set up around eating regular meals

The same mechanics as everything else here, pointed at what actually matters for this one.

A sentence or a photo per meal

No database lookup and no calorie box. The log that gets kept beats the log that was more precise for eleven days.

Trends, not days

Weight moves a couple of kilos on water alone. Everything here is read as a weekly trend, because the daily number is mostly noise and reads as failure on a perfectly good week.

What the good weeks had in common

The useful question isn't what you ate on Tuesday, it's what was different about the months that went somewhere. That's a query against your own record, and it's the one worth asking.

Your goal, not one we set

We don't calculate a target for you. Any number an app produces here is a population average wearing your name, and it will be wrong by enough to matter.

A bad week is a data point

Nothing resets and nothing is undone. A week off is information about what makes a week hard, which is considerably more useful than a broken chain.

Exportable from day one

Everything you've logged, photos included, out in a file you can take to a dietitian, a GP, or somewhere else entirely.

The reason a lot of people start

Something to actually bring to the appointment

You get fifteen minutes, and the first question is always some version of "so what does a normal week look like?" — which nobody on earth can answer accurately from memory.

What this gives you: The pattern behind most of the other things you'd raise, which is why it's usually the first thing you'll be asked about.

  • Export the date range you were asked about, as a file you can print
  • Photos alongside the entries, which say more than any description
  • Counts and timings rather than an impression of the worst week
  • Nothing shared anywhere unless you choose to share it

What it won't do

  • Score a meal, or sort food into good and bad
  • Estimate calories from a photo and present the guess as a number
  • Set you a calorie target, a macro target, or a weight
  • Run a streak you can break, or tell you that you've fallen behind
  • Comment on your body. The photos here are of food
  • Diagnose anything, or suggest that a pattern is a diagnosis

It's a notebook that can do arithmetic and answer questions about itself. Deciding what any of it means is a job for you and the people advising you.

Early access

Start with what you're already trying to hold in your head

Tell us what you've been trying to keep track of and we'll set it up with you — recording the thing that's actually useful, at a cadence that survives a bad week.

  • Founding accounts lock their price for life
  • No card, no trial clock, no notification designed to make you feel behind
  • Export everything you've logged, photos included, whenever you want

No card required. Unsubscribe any time.

Keep the record without it becoming another job

Founding pricing is locked for accounts opened during early access.

Founding accounts lock their price for life. No card required.