Why this is hard to keep track of

  • Every diet you've followed taught you to overrule the signal on purpose
  • Hunger and boredom and thirst and tiredness feel remarkably alike
  • Fullness lands about twenty minutes late, long after the decision
  • A number means nothing on its own and everything with sixty others

Worth recording

  • Roughly how hungry you were before, on whatever scale you like
  • How full about half an hour after, which is when it's actually readable
  • What the meal was, in a few words
  • How long it had been since you last ate

Cadence

Two numbers around a meal. Five seconds, once or twice a day

In practice

Say it once, or photograph it

The entries most worth having are the ones made at the exact moment nobody wants to fill in a form. A sentence — typed, dictated, or replaced entirely by a photo of the plate — is a much lower bar, and it carries the context a calorie field would have thrown away.

Hunger & Fullness Chat

Ate about one when I was pretty hungry — maybe a two. Sandwich and soup. Comfortable after, not stuffed.

Called 4 tools

  • log_meal(items: ["sandwich", "soup"], at: "13:00")
  • log_hunger(before: 2, after: 6)
  • get_history(metric: "hunger", window: "30d")
  • find_pattern(group_by: "gap_since_last_meal")

Logged. A two before eating usually shows up when the gap since your last meal passed about six hours — 11 of your 14 twos. Meals you started at four or five ended at a six or seven afterwards far more often than the ones you started at one or two.

Every figure here was counted from entries you made. The model chose which tools to call — it doesn't score the meal, estimate calories from a photo, or decide what any of it says about you.

And then ask

The question the log can answer

Months of entries hold real answers to the things you've been guessing at, and reading them properly has always meant a spreadsheet and a free evening — which is exactly what nobody has.

Ask in plain language. The answers come back with the counts behind them, including when those counts are too thin to mean anything yet — which is the more useful answer far more often than people expect.

Asking about the pattern Chat

Am I actually getting better at noticing this, or does it just feel like it?

Called 3 tools

  • get_history(topic: "hunger-cues", window: "6m")
  • find_pattern(group_by: "context")
  • compare_periods(metric: "entries")

Something has moved. Over your first month, 22 of 38 meals started at a two or below. Last month, that's 9 of 41. The average gap between meals came down by about an hour and a half over the same period, which is the most plausible reason. Overshooting into the eights and nines has roughly halved.

Counts and averages over your own entries, nothing more. Where the data is confounded or too thin, the answer says so instead of rounding it into a conclusion.

What it does

Set up around hunger & fullness

The same mechanics as everything else here, pointed at what actually matters for this one.

An entry is a sentence

Type it or say it. No item lookup, no portion field, nothing to complete before the entry counts — which is the whole reason this one survives past week three.

Or just a photo

A picture of the plate takes a second and records the thing descriptions are worst at. We store it against the entry; we don't estimate a calorie count from it and hand you the guess.

Context, not just food

Where you were, who with, what had just happened. In almost every log on this site the pattern turns out to live in the context rather than in what was eaten.

No streak to break

A gap in the record is a gap in the record. Nothing resets, nothing is lost, and nothing tells you that four missed days undid the month before them.

Readable across months

One rough fortnight reads as one rough fortnight when it sits on a six-month line — which is the view that changes what people believe about themselves, and the one a daily score can't draw.

Yours, and exportable

Everything you've written and every photo, out in one file whenever you want it — including the date range a dietitian or therapist asked you about.

The reason a lot of people start

Something to actually bring to the appointment

You get fifteen minutes, and the first question is always some version of "so what does a normal week look like?" — which nobody on earth can answer accurately from memory.

What this gives you: Evidence of what your appetite is actually doing, which is exactly what intuitive eating work and most dietitian sessions ask you to bring and almost nobody has.

  • Export the date range you were asked about, as a file you can print
  • Photos alongside the entries, which say more than any description
  • Counts and timings rather than an impression of the worst week
  • Nothing shared anywhere unless you choose to share it

What it won't do

  • Score a meal, or sort food into good and bad
  • Estimate calories from a photo and present the guess as a number
  • Set you a calorie target, a macro target, or a weight
  • Run a streak you can break, or tell you that you've fallen behind
  • Comment on your body. The photos here are of food
  • Diagnose anything, or suggest that a pattern is a diagnosis

It's a notebook that can do arithmetic and answer questions about itself. Deciding what any of it means is a job for you and the people advising you.

Early access

Start with what you're already trying to hold in your head

Tell us what you've been trying to keep track of and we'll set it up with you — recording the thing that's actually useful, at a cadence that survives a bad week.

  • Founding accounts lock their price for life
  • No card, no trial clock, no notification designed to make you feel behind
  • Export everything you've logged, photos included, whenever you want

No card required. Unsubscribe any time.

Keep the record without it becoming another job

Founding pricing is locked for accounts opened during early access.

Founding accounts lock their price for life. No card required.